Cricket Farm Bin Types: Which Container Is Best for Your Operation?
Commercially manufactured cricket bins reduce substrate replacement cost by 30% compared to repurposed plastic totes. That cost difference reflects a real design distinction: commercial bins are built to drain, clean, and ventilate in ways that standard storage totes aren't. Over hundreds of production cycles, those design advantages compound.
This guide compares the main bin types, covers the cost-per-bin and FCR tradeoffs, and helps you decide when to upgrade.
TL;DR
- Commercially manufactured cricket bins reduce substrate replacement cost by 30% compared to repurposed plastic totes.
- For operations under 20 bins, 66-quart plastic storage totes with cut ventilation screens are the most cost-effective starting point.
- Once you're past 20 bins or producing for food-grade buyers, commercial insect bins justify their higher upfront cost through reduced substrate consumption, better sanitization, and longer bin lifespan.
- The FCR improvement from upgrading bins is typically 0.1-0.2 points, which at a 30-bin scale translates to 10-15% less feed cost for the same production output.
- At under 20 bins, the upfront cost difference ($15 vs $60 per bin) is the dominant factor and plastic totes win on economics.
- Above 30 bins, the operational advantages of commercial bins (lower substrate cost, easier cleaning, better sanitation for food-grade compliance) start to outweigh the higher per-bin price.
- At 5-10 bins, problems are manageable.
The Three Main Bin Categories
1.
- At this scale, the cost savings outweigh the production disadvantages.
2.
- They also reduce cleaning labor because the drainage and ventilation features are already built in.
3.
- For operations under 20 bins, 66-quart plastic storage totes with cut ventilation screens are the most cost-effective starting point.
- The FCR improvement from upgrading bins is typically 0.1-0.2 points, which at a 30-bin scale translates to 10-15% less feed cost for the same production output.
- At under 20 bins, the upfront cost difference ($15 vs $60 per bin) is the dominant factor and plastic totes win on economics.
The Three Main Bin Categories
1. Repurposed Plastic Storage Totes
The standard entry point for new cricket farmers. 66-quart Rubbermaid or Sterilite storage totes are available at any big-box retailer for $10-$15 each.
Advantages:
- Low upfront cost (under $15/bin to start)
- Widely available, easy to replace
- Clear sides allow easy visual inspection without opening
- Multiple sizes available
Disadvantages:
- Not designed for drainage or easy cleaning; substrate tends to accumulate moisture in corners
- Lids require cutting for ventilation screening, which takes time and produces inconsistent results
- Shorter lifespan under repeated cleaning with disinfectants -- the plastic degrades and becomes difficult to sanitize properly
- Substrate contact with the smooth plastic walls creates dead zones where humidity concentrates and mold can develop
Repurposed plastic totes are appropriate for operations under 20 bins or for first-year operators learning the basics. At this scale, the cost savings outweigh the production disadvantages.
2. Commercially Manufactured Insect Bins
Purpose-built containers designed specifically for cricket and other insect farming applications. Suppliers include specialty insect farming equipment companies in the US and Europe.
Advantages:
- Drainage channels built into the floor of the bin reduce substrate moisture accumulation
- Snap-fit ventilation panels (no cutting required) with standard mesh specifications
- Stackable design allows higher bin density than storage totes
- Commercial-grade plastic withstands repeated disinfectant cleaning for 5+ years
- Standard dimensions allow consistent shelving design and bin placement
Disadvantages:
- Higher upfront cost ($40-$80/bin depending on supplier and volume)
- Longer lead times from specialty suppliers
- Less flexibility in size -- you get the manufacturer's dimensions, not custom sizes
Commercial bins reduce substrate replacement cost by 30% because their drainage design keeps substrate drier, extending usable life before replacement. They also reduce cleaning labor because the drainage and ventilation features are already built in.
3. Custom Wood-Frame Enclosures
Built-to-spec wooden enclosures, typically with screen mesh sides and removable trays. Common in larger operations that want specific dimensions or that are building into dedicated shelving systems.
Advantages:
- Fully customizable dimensions
- Can be built to maximize space efficiency for a specific facility layout
- Screen mesh sides provide excellent ventilation
- Often measurably cheaper at scale if you're building them in-house
Disadvantages:
- Wood is difficult to fully sanitize; harbors bacteria, mold, and mites in grain and joints
- Requires carpentry skills to build correctly
- Higher labor to maintain -- wooden enclosures need periodic inspection for mold and pest damage
- Generally not appropriate for food-grade operations due to sanitization limitations
Custom wood-frame enclosures have a niche in certain feeder cricket operations but are generally not appropriate for food-grade flour production where sanitation standards are strict.
Cost-Per-Bin Comparison Over 3 Years
| Bin Type | Upfront Cost | Annual Maintenance (substrate, cleaning) | 3-Year Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic storage totes | $12 | $18 | $66 |
| Commercial insect bins | $60 | $12 | $96 |
| Custom wood-frame | $35 | $28 | $119 |
At small scales, plastic totes look like the clear winner. At scale, the gap narrows because of the substrate cost reduction and longer lifespan of commercial bins. The FCR impact of better bins (0.1-0.2 improvement from better moisture and ventilation management) also adds value that doesn't appear in the cost table directly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best container to raise crickets in?
It depends on your scale and market. For operations under 20 bins, 66-quart plastic storage totes with cut ventilation screens are the most cost-effective starting point. Once you're past 20 bins or producing for food-grade buyers, commercial insect bins justify their higher upfront cost through reduced substrate consumption, better sanitization, and longer bin lifespan. Custom wood-frame enclosures have specific use cases in larger feeder operations but aren't appropriate for food-grade production. Use CricketOps to track FCR and die-off rate by bin type so you can make the upgrade decision with data rather than intuition.
How does bin type affect cricket FCR?
Bin design affects FCR primarily through moisture management and temperature uniformity. Plastic totes with inadequate drainage tend to accumulate substrate moisture that leads to mold growth, feed degradation, and cricket stress -- all of which push FCR higher. Commercial insect bins with drainage channels and purpose-built ventilation maintain drier substrate conditions that support better feed efficiency. The FCR improvement from upgrading bins is typically 0.1-0.2 points, which at a 30-bin scale translates to 10-15% less feed cost for the same production output. Better ventilation also reduces the ammonia buildup that suppresses appetite and growth rate.
At what scale should I switch from plastic totes to commercial cricket bins?
The typical decision point is 20-30 bins, or whenever you transition from hobby/startup to commercial production with food-grade buyers. At under 20 bins, the upfront cost difference ($15 vs $60 per bin) is the dominant factor and plastic totes win on economics. Above 30 bins, the operational advantages of commercial bins (lower substrate cost, easier cleaning, better sanitation for food-grade compliance) start to outweigh the higher per-bin price. If you're pursuing food manufacturer buyers who will want facility inspections, commercial insect bins signal operational seriousness in a way that cut-lid storage totes don't.
How does CricketOps help track the metrics described in this article?
CricketOps provides bin-level logging for the variables that drive production outcomes -- feed inputs, environmental conditions, mortality events, and harvest results. Rather than maintaining these records in separate spreadsheets, you can view performance trends across bins and over time to identify which operational variables correlate with better outcomes in your specific facility.
Where can I find industry benchmarks to compare my operation's performance?
The North American Coalition for Insect Agriculture (NACIA) publishes periodic industry reports with production benchmarks. University extension programs in agricultural states, including the University of Georgia and University of Florida IFAS, occasionally publish insect farming production data. Industry conferences hosted by the Entomological Society of America and the Insects to Feed the World symposium series are additional sources of peer benchmarking data.
What is the biggest operational mistake cricket farmers make in their first year?
Expanding bin count before achieving consistent FCR and mortality targets in existing bins is the most common and costly first-year mistake. At 5-10 bins, problems are manageable. At 30-50 bins, the same proportional problems represent much larger financial losses. Most experienced cricket farmers recommend holding expansion until you have three consecutive production cycles hitting your FCR and mortality targets.
Sources
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) -- Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security
- North American Coalition for Insect Agriculture (NACIA)
- Entomological Society of America
- Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (Wageningen Academic Publishers)
- USDA Agricultural Research Service
Get Started with CricketOps
The practices covered in this article are easier to apply consistently when they are supported by organized production data. CricketOps gives cricket farmers the tools to track what matters -- by bin, by batch, and over time. Start your next production cycle in CricketOps and see how organized data changes the way you manage your operation.
